StateCover Mutual Ltd v Smith  NSWCA 27.
28. The second respondent did not contend that the present was a case where the common experience of the decision maker was sufficient to support the finding (see Tubemakers of Australia Ltd v Fernandez (1976) 50 ALJR 720 at 724 - 725) or that the Commission, as a specialist tribunal, was entitled to, and did here, use knowledge acquired as a specialised tribunal to make the finding (see generally ICI Australia Operations Pty Ltd v WorkCover Authority of New South Wales  NSWCA 55; 60 NSWLR 18 at  -  and Dasreef Pty Ltd v Hawchar  HCA 21; 85 ALJR 694 at  - ). Nor did the second respondent submit that the lay evidence of Mr Smith was, alone, capable of supporting the finding.
12 editions - $385 incl GST
12 editions $385 incl GST